Hexemer v. General Electric Company et al
| Soheila Hexemer |
| General Electric Company, GID Global, LLC and Jose Garcia |
| 1:2012cv01808 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Saratoga |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 65) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 65) for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs (1) Title VII Claim against all Defendants; and (2) § 1981 and NYSHRL retaliation claims against Defendant General Electric. Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 65) for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiffs § 1981 and NYSHRL retaliation claims against Defendants GID and Jose Garcia; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant General Electric is DISMISSED from the case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 29, 2015. (sas)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM, DECISION & ORDER re 60 MOTION to Withdraw. It is hereby ORDERED that the motion by The Ottinger Law Firm to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Hexemer is DENIED. Dispositive motions to be filed by 12/12/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 10/28/2014. (dpk)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 6) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaints (Dkt. No. 1) First Claim (for discrimination and hostile work environment in violation of § ; 1981) and Third Claim (for discrimination and hostile work environment in violation of the HRL) are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 6), to the extent it seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs Second Claim (for retaliation in violation of § 1981) and Fourth Claim (for retaliation in violation of the HRL), is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 11, 2013. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
