In the Matter of InJah Tafari
| InJah Tafari |
| 1:2012mc00042 |
| June 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1
ORDER - That Tafari shall, within fourteen (14) days of the date ofthis Order, show cause, in writing, why he should not be enjoined from anyfurther filings in the Northern District of New York without leave of the ChiefJudge. That, if Taf ari does not fully comply with this Order, thecourt will issue a subsequent order, without further explanation, permanently enjoining Tafari from filing a pleading or document of any kindin any future case in this District without leave of the court. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/19/2012. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In the Matter of InJah Tafari | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: InJah Tafari | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
