Assembly Point Aviation, Inc. v. Richmor Aviation, Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 27, 2017
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant's # 110 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant's motion to certify the Court's May 19, 2017 Memorandum-Decision and Order fo r an interlocutory appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's # 113 cross-motion is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 7/27/2017. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 7/27/2017. (nmk)
|May 19, 2017
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's # 102 motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that the # 100 judgment in this case is VACATED. The Court further ORDERS that counsel shall participate in a telephone conference with the Court on June 19, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. to schedule a date for a new trial in this matter. The Court will provide counsel with the telephone number for the conference prior to the scheduled date. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 5/19/2017. (nmk)
|July 28, 2016
JUDGMENT: in favor of Richmor Aviation, Inc. against Assembly Point Aviation, Inc. (nmk)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?