Dudla v. P.M. Veglio LLC et al
| Shawn Dudla |
| P.M. Veglio LLC, Von Curtis, Inc., Guilio Veglio and Winn C. Clayburgh |
| 1:2013cv00333 |
| March 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Saratoga |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 58) to strike is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 51) to dismiss is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 1) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 64) for sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 15, 2016. ***A copy of this order & subsequent judgment was served upon the pro se party by Certified US Mail & Regular US Mail. (sas)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 9) to dismiss is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 12) is, to the extent it seeks a retroactive two-day extension of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) deadline so as to render the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 11) an amendment as of course, GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 12) is, to the extent it seeks leave to file an amended complaint, DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that, within twenty-one (21) days of the filing date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, Plaintiff must file a signed copy of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is to make no other changes to the Amended Complain t. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to replace Docket Number 11 with the signed copy; and it is further ORDERED, that, within twenty-one (21) days of the filing date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, Defendant Veglio must submit: (1) an aff idavit and supporting documentation regarding his domicile at the time the Complaint was filed; and (2) a memorandum as to whether he is an indispensable party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b). Plaintiff may respond within fourteen (14) days thereafter. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 28, 2014. A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas) Modified on 2/28/2014 to add mailing notation (sas).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
