Monsour v. New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 10, 2016
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 72 Motion for Discovery: to preclude plaintiff from offering the testimony of certain witnesses at trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(C)(1). ORDERED, that discovery will be reopened for THIRTY (30) days f ollowing the entry of this Memorandum-Decision and Order for the limited purpose of obtaining depositions of Jeremy Willett, James Michael Burns, Michael Carey, Max E. Chmura, Christine Galvin, Danny Hakim, James Introne, Linda Lacewell, and L.P., an d it is further ORDERED, that expenses incurred as a result of these depositions should any be taken shall be bourne by plaintiff as set forth herein; and it is further ORDERED, that parties have sixty (60) days following the expiration of the thi rty (30) day discovery continuance to file any dispositive motions with the Court; and it is further ORDERED, that the Court will issue a text order in this case scheduling a Rule 16 conference to take place after the expiration of the thirty (30) day continuance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 6/10/2016. (tab)
|March 12, 2014
DECISION AND ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; granting 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and all claims against Introne are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/12/14. (tab)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?