Gaul et al v. Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC et al
| Jeffrey Gaul and Paula Gaul |
| DCFS Trust, TD Auto Finance LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Daimler Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, Trans-Union LLC, Equifax Inc. and Deily, Mooney & Glastetter LLP |
| 1:2013cv00433 |
| April 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER granting Deft Experian Information Solution, Inc.'s 131 Motion to Dismiss. Deft Experian Information Solution, Inc. is hereby dismissed from the case w/ prejudice; Signed by Sr. District Judge Thomas J. McAvoy dtd 10/28/2014 (cml)
|
|
Filing
84
DECISION AND ORDER regarding discovery issues: Equifax has until 5/9/14 to respond to Pltfs' request for admissions, if not, then Gaul may file a motion to compel. Gaul must respond to Interrogatories and Demand for production by 5/9/14, if not, Experian may file a motion to compel. Gaul was directed to provide responses and documents to DMG's Demands by 5/16/14, if not, DMG may file a motion to compel. If the Gauls fail to appear for their depositions on 6/4/14 and 6/5/14, the defts may filed motions to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 5/1/14. [Served by mail.](sfp, )
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Pltfs' 59 Omnibus Motion: (a) Pltfs' motion to join CBC Company is denied; (b) Pltfs' motion to compel Equifax to respond to requests for admissions is granted in pa rt. To the extent that Equifax has not responded to the request for admission, it must do so by 4/22/14; (c) Pltfs' motion for instruction on how to defend against a motion for summary judgment is denied; (d) Pltfs' motion to compel DMG to respond to their demands is denied; and (e) Pltfs' request access to electronic filing is granted. DMG's motion to compel is granted to the extent that Pltfs must supplement their responses to interrogatories and produce any further docume ntation they may have, consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order, by 5/16/14. Further, Paula Gaul must independently sign all responses so that there are no questions that the responses reflect her position as well as Jeffrey Gaul. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 4/16/14. [Served by mail.] (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
73
DECISION AND ORDER denying Deft Equifax, Inc.'s 56 Motion to Dismiss and enforce settlement. Pltf's 60 motion for sanctions and to enforce settlement, as stated in their brief in opposition to Deft's motion, is denied. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 4/14/14. [Served by mail.] (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
32
DECISION AND ORDER re 24 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS the motion in part as to Defendants Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, DCFS Trust and TD Auto Finance LLC and stays the instant pr oceedings as to these Defendants and further directs Plaintiffs to submit to arbitration as to these Defendants in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement. This matter may otherwise proceed as against any remaining defendants. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/23/2013. (dpk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
