Panagopoulos v. New York State Department of Transportation

Plaintiff: Celeste M. Panagopoulos
Defendant: New York State Department of Transportation
Case Number: 1:2013cv00459
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: New York Northern District Court
Office: Albany Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Referring Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 24, 2016 38 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER granting # 24 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/24/16. (lmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Panagopoulos v. New York State Department of Transportation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celeste M. Panagopoulos
Represented By: Cory R. Dalmata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York State Department of Transportation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?