Brown et al v. State of New York et al
| Barbara G. Brown, Arthur Cheliotes, John Clancy, Clifford Koppelman, Brenda Levinson, Christopher Manning, John Strandberg and Joseph C. Walsh |
| State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, New York Unified Court System, Jonathan Lippman, A. Gail Prudenti, New York State Civil Service Department, Patricia A. Hite, New York State Civil Service Commission, Caroline W. Ahl, Dennis Hanrahan, Robert L. Megna and Thomas P. DiNapoli |
| 1:2013cv00645 |
| June 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David N. Hurd |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Contract: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 106 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 106) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall attach a copy of the decision in the Lead Case (Donohue v. Cuomo, No. 1:11-cv-1530, Dkt. No. 102) to this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance in the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/24/2018. (Attachments: # 1 MDO in 11-cv-1530) (ban)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 66 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendations re 72 Report and Recommendations. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/20/15. (ban)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED IN PART AND DEN IED IN PART; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint as against the State of New York, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Civil Service Department, New York State Civil Service Commission, and New York State and Local Retirement System is GRANTED in its entirety; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claims for monetary damages asserted against Defendants Cuomo, Lippman, Prudenti, Hite, Ahl, Hanrahan , Megna, and DiNapoli in their official capacity is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claims for injunctive and declaratory relief asserted against Defendants Cuomo, Lippman, Prudenti, Hite, Ahl, Hanra han, Megna, and DiNapoli in their official capacity is GRANTED only to the extent that such claims seek retrospective relief; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Article 78 claims is GRANTED; and the Court furthe r ORDERS that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claims asserted against Defendants Cuomo, Lippman, Prudenti, Ahl, Hanrahan, and DiNapoli in their personal capacity is GRANTED, with leave to amend; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/30/13. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
