Trostle v. The State of New York et al
Plaintiff: Melissa Trostle
Defendant: The State of New York, Theresa Knapp-David and Doug Botsford
Case Number: 1:2013cv00709
Filed: June 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER granting # 31 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. All of the claims in Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) are dismissed, except for her Title VII retaliation claim against the State of New York, which shall be dis missed if not corrected as specified within this Decision and Order. Plaintiff has FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Decision and Order to file an Amended Complaint asserting her Title VII retaliation claim (Count Two in the original Complain t) against DOCCS; and should Plaintiff fail to file an Amended Complaint by APRIL 7, 2016, Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim against the State of New York shall be DISMISSED without further Order of the Court. Defense counsel is directed t o file a letter on the docket by APRIL 1, 2016 advising whether or not he is authorized to accept service of the Amended Complaint on behalf of Defendant DOCCS. If defense counsel will not accept service, Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of tha t Amended Complaint upon Defendant DOCCS pursuant to Rule 4 of the Fed.R.Civ.P., and file an affidavit of service thereafter. Defendant DOCCS is directed to file an answer thereafter pursuant to Rule 12. Upon the filing of the Amended Complaint and response thereto, a pretrial conference will be scheduled to set a trial date. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/24/16. (lmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trostle v. The State of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Trostle
Represented By: Elmer R. Keach, III
Represented By: Sarmili Saha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State of New York
Represented By: Heather R. Rubinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Knapp-David
Represented By: Heather R. Rubinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doug Botsford
Represented By: Heather R. Rubinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?