Lynch v. Claus et al
Plaintiff: Mark Lynch
Defendant: County of Schenectady District Attorney, City of Schenectady, Schenectady Police Dept., P.O. John Doe, P.O. James Claus, Schenectady County Public Defender's Office and Schenectady County
Case Number: 1:2013cv00830
Filed: July 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Rensselaer
Presiding Judge: Christian F. Hummel
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Approving the # 63 Stipulation, therefore this action is discontinued against defendants, with prejudice and without costs to either party as against the other. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/5/2014. (jmb) {Copy served upon pro se plaintiff by regular mail}
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 DECISION & ORDER: It is ordered that the # 44 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice to renew as noted herein, further it is ordered that the # 44 request for a settlement conference is GRANTED. All parties are directed to appear f or a Settlement Conference on 4/24/2014 at 2:00 PM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. The Clerk shall provide Mr. Lynch with a blank copy of the Notice of Change of Address form with this order, as it is his responsiblity pursuant to Local Rule 10.1(c)(2) & 41.2)(b), to update the Court with any changes to his address via the Notice of Change of Address form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 3/28/2014. {Clerk served a copy of this order and the Notice of Change of Address form upon Mark Lynch by regular mail} (jmb)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 SUMMARY ORDER - That the letter motion of the County, County of Schenectady District Attorney, and Schenectady County Public Defender's Office requesting dismissal of Lynch's filing (Dkt. No. 27) is DENIED. That Lynch's application re garding the dismissal of the County of Schenectady District Attorney and Schenectady County Public Defender's Office (Dkt. No. 25) is DENIED. That the Clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect that the Doe defendants have been identified as "Police officer Shepler" and "Police officer I.D. #5142," and that, upon receipt from Lynch of the documents required for service of process, the Clerk be directed to issue summonses and forward them, together with copies of L ynch's complaint, a General Order No. 25 packet, which sets forth this District's civil case management plan requirements, a copy of the Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order previously issued in this case, to the United States Marshal for serv ice upon Police officer Shelpler and Police officer I.D. #5142. That the Clerk is directed to terminate Schenectady Police Dept., City of Schenectady, County of Schenectady District Attorney, Schenectady County Public Defender's Office, and Sch enectady County. That the only claim accepted for filing is one of excessive force against P.O. James Claus, Police officer Shelpler, and Police officer I.D. #5142. That the motion to dismiss of County of Schenectady District Attorney, Schenectady County Public Defender's Officer, and Schenectady County (Dkt. No. 33) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/28/2014. (jel, )
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER & REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: granting the # 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mark Lynch, Recommending that the claims of false arrest, false imprisonment, prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel be dismissed as barred, recommended that prior to dismissing the municipal defendants Lynch be given an opportunity to amend his complaint to clarify any Monell claims, recommended that the Court allow Lynch's claims alleging excessive force in violation with the Eighth Amendment be accepted for filing and that upon receipt from Lynch of the documents required for service of process, the Clerk be directed to issue summonses and forward them together with copies of the complaint and General Order 25 to the US Marshal Service for service of process. Objections to R&R due by 8/8/2013, Case Review Deadline 8/12/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 7/19/2013. {Copy served upon pro se plaintiff by regular mail} (jmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lynch v. Claus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Schenectady District Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Schenectady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schenectady Police Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P.O. John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P.O. James Claus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schenectady County Public Defender's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schenectady County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?