Langdon et al v. The County of Columbia et al
Plaintiff: Frank Dinehart Langdon and Grant Dinehart Langdon
Defendant: The County of Columbia, Paul Proper, Jr., Carl Whitbeck, Jason Shaw and Paul Czajka
Case Number: 1:2013cv00842
Filed: July 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Columbia
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 95 DECISION AND ORDER: that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, dkt. # 89 , is hereby Denied. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to stop accepting filings from Grant Dinehart Langdon in this matter. The Court will take an additional a ction. "The filing of repetitive and frivolous suits constitutes the type of abuse for which an injunction forbidding future litigation may be an appropriate sanction." Id. The Court with therefore forward this opinion to the Chief Judge of the District and recommend that he issue to Plaintiff Grant D. Langdon an Order to Show Cause why an order permanently enjoining him from filing a pleading or document of any kind in the District without leave of Court should not be issued. Si gned by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 01/16/2020. (Copy of this Decision and Order was served upon Frank Dinehart Langdon at 659 Rt. 217, Hudson, NY 12534 and Grant Dinehart Langdon at 170 Willow Pond Way, Penfield, NY 14526 via regular mail on 1/16/2020.)(hmr)
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 78 DECISION and ORDER: This matter has ended in the Defendants' favor. Nothing in any of Plaintiff Grant Langdon's filings can alter that fact. Any further filings by Plaintiffs will cause a waste of judicial time and resources. The Court t herefore cautions Plaintiffs that any further filings which reharsh issues decided long ago and which are the subject of final and binding orders will lead the Court to impose the money sanctions for contempt of court. The Court has already provided a warning about potential contempt sanctions, and contempt sanctions will follow any additional frivolous findings. As such, Plaintiffs' motions for reconsideration, dkt. #s 75 - 76 , are hereby Denied. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 05/30/2018. (Copy served via regular mail upon pro se plaintiffs on 5/31/2018.)(hmr)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 57 DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltf Grant Dinehart Langdon's 50 Motion for Reconsideration and denying 54 Letter Request. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/21/14. [Served by mail.] (sfp, )
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting Defendants' 8 and 14 Motions to Dismiss and dismissing the Plaintiffs' complaint in its entirety. Columbia County Defendants may file and serve an application for attorney's fees w/in 30 days from the date of this decision. Plaintiffs may file and serve opposition to the amount of any claimed fees and costs w/in 45 days of the date of this decision. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/16/2013. (amt) [Pltfs served via reg. and cert. mail]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Langdon et al v. The County of Columbia et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Dinehart Langdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grant Dinehart Langdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The County of Columbia
Represented By: James A. Resila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Proper, Jr.
Represented By: James A. Resila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Whitbeck
Represented By: James A. Resila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Shaw
Represented By: David B. Cabaniss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Czajka
Represented By: James A. Resila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?