Karam et al v. County of Rensselaer, New York et al
| James Karam and Lisa Karam |
| County of Rensselaer, New York, Jack Mahar, Patrick Russo, Kathleen Jimino, Ruth Vibert, Harold Smith, Tom Hendry, Linda Baldwin, John Doe(s) and Jane Doe(s) |
| 1:2013cv01018 |
| August 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Rensselaer |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 153 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 164 Motion in Limine: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motions in limine are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth herein, and the Court furtherORDERS that Plaintiff's motions in limine are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth herein; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's ninth cause of action pursuant to N.Y. Civ il Rights Law § 40-c is DISMISSED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 5/25/16. (ban)
|
|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 99 101 Motions for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 99 and 101) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as se t forth herein; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant Vibert's cross-claim against Defendant Rensselaer County is DISMISSED as moot; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants Russo, Jimino, Vibert, Smith, Hendry, Baldwin, and Doe(s) are TERMINATED from this action; and the Court furtherORDERS that Plaintiff Lisa Karam is TERMINATED from this action; and the Courtfurther ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 1/4/16. (ban)
|
|
Filing
76
DISCOVERY ORDER. The Court conducted an in camera review of two tapes of conversations provided to chambers. For all the reasons stated herein, the taped conversations between Union Representations and Karam -- tape 802_042 and 802_44 -- are not pr otected by the work product doctrine and must be disclosed to defendants. ORDERED that the plaintiff retrieve the disk with thesse taped conversations from the Court's Chambers and then disclose them to the defendants forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 2/10/2015. (lah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
