Nickel et al v. Brenton LLC et al
Peter A. Nickel and Kinematic Technologies, Inc. |
Brenton LLC and Pro Mach Group, Inc. |
1:2013cv01153 |
September 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
Schenectady |
Mae A. D'Agostino |
Christian F. Hummel |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 27 Motion in Limine; denying 30 Motion in Limine; denying in part and reserving on in part 33 Motion in Limine. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 11/6/2015. (bto) |
Filing 18 DECISION AND ORDER re 5 Jury Demand filed by Peter A. Nickel: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's request for a jury trial in this matter is hereby GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/27/2015. (ban) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff Peter Nickel is DISMISSED from this action; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant Pro Mach Group, Inc. is DISMISSED from this action. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/11/15. (ban) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.