Prue v. Hudson Falls Post No. 574, The American Legion, Department of New York et al
Plaintiff: Joy Prue
Defendant: Hudson Falls Post No. 574, The American Legion, Department of New York and Chris Fontaine
Case Number: 1:2013cv01280
Filed: October 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Christian F. Hummel
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Scullin
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 106 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff is entitled to damages in the amount of $11,272.50 for overtime compensation arising out of her employment with Defendant, together with reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff. (nmk)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' # 62 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Chris Fontaine is DISMISSED. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff' s # 27 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Defendant Post 574's liability for non-willful violation of the FLSA is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that Defendants' # 16 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED. T he Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's # 15 Motion to Strike Defendants' Amended Answer and affirmative defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the alternative, for a More Definite Statement is DENIED as moot. The Court further OR DERS that counsel shall participate in a telephone conference with the Court on May 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. to set a hearing date to determine the following: (1) the number of hours that Plaintiff worked as house manager for each week between April 17 , 2011, and April 1, 2012, and (2) the regular hourly rate at which Defendant Post 574 should compensate Plaintiff for the hours that she worked as house manager in excess of forty hours per week for the period between April 27, 2011, until November 2012. The Court will provide dial-in instructions to counsel for the telephone conference prior to May 12, 2015. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 3/31/2015. (nmk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prue v. Hudson Falls Post No. 574, The American Legion, Department of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joy Prue
Represented By: Dale J. Morgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hudson Falls Post No. 574, The American Legion, Department of New York
Represented By: Charles G. Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Fontaine
Represented By: Charles G. Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?