Tillery v. NYS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Service et al
Michele Tillery |
NYS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Service, Laurie Felter, Stephen Mantor and Michael A. Lawler |
1:2013cv01528 |
December 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
Randolph F. Treece |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that OASASs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 88) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Tillerys Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 19) is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 05, 2017. (sas) |
Filing 45 DECISION and ORDERED that Defendants Second Motion (Dkt. No. 37) to dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 08, 2015. (sas) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 14) to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs Title VII claims against the Individual Defendants and Plaintiffs HRL claims against OASAS are DISMISSED. The remainder of Plaintiffs claims may proceed. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 30, 2014. ***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas) Modified on 5/30/2014 to add mail note(sas). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.