Humphrey v. Riley et al
Donald J. Humphrey |
Kenneth D. Riley, Peter R. Cole, Chandra Jones, Sailaja Alapati, Bhavana Daruvari, Darielle D. Dartt, Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital, Albany Medical Center and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
1:2014cv00080 |
January 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
Albany |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Gary L. Sharpe |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That Humphrey's 6 Motion to Remand to State Court is GRANTED insofar as it seeks remand of this case to state court and DENIED insofar as it seeks an award of costs. That Bayer's 5 Motion to Dismiss f or Failure to State a Claim is DENIED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That Humphrey's 7 letter motion requesting an adjournment of Bayer's motion to dismiss is DENIED. That this action is REMANDED to the New York State Supre me Court in Albany County for all further proceedings. That the Clerk is directed to mail a certified copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order to the Clerk of Supreme Court of the State of new York in Albany County and instruct him to file the Memorandum-Decision and Order in Humphrey v. Riley et al., Index No. 6231/13. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/10/2014. (jel, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.