Mcrae v. The City of Hudson et al
| Jermaine Mcrae |
| Rowe, Nicholas M. Pierro, Randy Clarke, Edward L. Moore, Ellis Richardson, Gary Graziano, The City of Hudson, Keyser, Kevin Sweet and John Doe Police Officers #1-8 |
| 1:2014cv00236 |
| March 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Columbia |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| David N. Hurd |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER re defendants' motions to dismiss, Dkt. Nos. 18 , 20 and 22 , and plaintiff's cross-motion to amend, Dkt. No. 26 . The motion to dismiss filed by the City of Hudson, Gary Graziano, Ellis Richardson, and Edward Moore 18 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion to dismiss filed by Randy Clark 20 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion to dismiss filed by Nicholas M. Pierro, Officer Row, Keyser and Kevin Sweet 22 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; plaintiff Jermaine Mcrae's cross-motion to amend 26 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Amended Complaint [26-2] as the operative pleading; all claims asserted against defendants City of Hudson and Ellis Richardson are DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to remove those two defendants from the caption. Defendants shall file answers to the Amended Complaint on or before 2/6/2015. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/21/2015. (lah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
