Burgos v. Huggins et al
| Tomas Burgos |
| A. M. Huggins, Bryan Haag, David R. Homer, Christian F. Hummel, Gary L. Sharpe, Jack Mahar and County of Rensselaer |
| 1:2014cv00687 |
| June 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Rensselaer |
| David N. Hurd |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT: The # 11 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece is accepted in whole. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's # 1 Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for naming defendants who are protected by absolute immunity. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail.] (mc)
|
|
Filing
13
DECISION AND ORDER: adopting the # 11 Report and Recommendation in whole. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's # 1 Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), f or failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for naming defendants who are protected by absolute immunity. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 2/5/2015. [Copy sent to pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail.] (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
