Dennis v. Grady et al
| Ryan Dennis |
| Holley Carnright, Gaetano Buttari, James McMahon, Kimberly Hettwer, Keith Slevinski, Michael Bolz, Christopher Liebler, Michael T. Kowalski, Patrick J. Wisniewski, Robert J. Knapp, William V. Grady, John / Jane Doe, People of the State of New York, Peter M. Forman and Ryan D. Feltz |
| 1:2014cv01084 |
| September 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Greene |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
SUMMARY ORDER - That Dennis' objections (Dkt. No. 10) are REJECTED and DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/26/2014. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER that the 7 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel filed September 23, 2014 (Dkt. No. 7) is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That purusant to the Court's review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Dennis' complaint is dism issed as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994) and failure to state a claim. That Dennis' remaining motions for (1) emergency injunctive relief (Compl.; Am. Compl.; Dkt. No. 6) and (2) substitution of parties (Dkt. No. 4) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. That the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/16/2014. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
