Loguidice v. McTiernan et al
| Andrea D. Loguidice |
| Edward McTiernan, Stuart Brody, Benjamin Conlon, Marline Agnew, Deborah Christian, Phil Lodico, Marc Gerstman and John Does 1-5 |
| 1:2014cv01323 |
| October 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Schenectady |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
DECISION AND ORDER denying Defts' 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/5/19. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM- DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Pltf's 65 Motion to Compel as stated. Dispositive motion deadline is January 4, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on August 22, 2018. (jdp, )
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltf's 48 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 8/3/17. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 41 Motion to Compel and denying Plaintiff's 27 Letter Request, except to the limited extent that the Court granted Plaintiff's requests as encompassed within its review of the motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 8/25/2016. (amt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
