Morrison v. The City of Hudson et al
| Sharon Morrison |
| The City of Hudson, Cheryl Roberts, L. Edward Moore and John Doe |
| 1:2014cv01409 |
| November 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Columbia |
| David E. Peebles |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part # 54 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. All of plaintiff's claims are dismissed, except for the following two claims which survive Defendants' motion: (1) Plaintiff' s claim for excessive force under the Fourth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Defendant Moore; and (2) Plaintiff's claim for assault and battery under New York State law against Defendant Moore. Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is dismissed against Defendants City of Hudson and Shane Bower. Counsel are direct to appear on 11/2/17 at 11:30 am in Syracuse, NY, in chambers for a pretrial conference, at which time counsel are directed to appear with settlement authority, and in t he event that the case does not settle, trial will be scheduled at that time. Plaintiff is further directed to forward a written settlement demand to Defendants no later than 10/13/17, and the parties are directed to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations before the conference. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/29/17. (lmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
