Lassig v. Woodward

Plaintiff: Michael G. Lassig
Defendant: William J. Woodward
Case Number: 1:2015cv00885
Filed: July 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Ulster
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: Christian F. Hummel
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2017 Filing 24 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 17 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/12/2017. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lassig v. Woodward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael G. Lassig
Represented By: Gardiner S. Barone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William J. Woodward
Represented By: William J. Greagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?