Watson v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Tyrone Watson
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 1:2015cv01356
Filed: November 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Ulster
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: Brenda K. Sannes
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for a bill of costs (Dkt. No. 190 ) is granted in the amount of $96.00 for service of process by the United States Marshals Service. Defendants are directed to make payment directly to the United States Marshals Service, P.O. Box 7260, Syracuse, NY 13261. Plaintiff's motion for a bill of costs is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 10/4/2019. (Copy served on Plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER denying 180 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 7/30/2019. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
March 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 147 ) to preclude evidence of prior convictions and his disciplinary history is DENIED as moot and that Plaintiff's objection (Dkt. No. 147 ) to a jury charge regarding qualified immunity is sustained. Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 143 ) seeking dismissal of all municipal liability claims and the dismissal of the City of Kingston and the Kingston Police Department as defendants is GRANTED; Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 143 ) seeking dismissal of Defendants Tinti and Wilber is DENIED; Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 143 ) to introduce evidence regarding Plaintiff's prior arrests and incarcerations is DENIED without prejudice t o renewal at trial; Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 143 ) to preclude Plaintiff from discussing "any favorable outcome of the charges" stemming from Plaintiff's October 18, 2012 arrest is DENIED without prejudice to ren ewal following the unsealing and procurement of the criminal docket relating to Plaintiff's arrest. Defendants' motion to dismiss the Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/4/2019. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 108 ) as to the excessive force claim against Defendant Wilber and the Monell excessive force claim is GRANTED; Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 108 ) is otherwise DENIED in its entirety. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/19/18. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 7) is ACCEPTED AS FILED; and it is further ORDERED that the Report Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) is ADO PTED as it applies to the amended complaint; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claim is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintif f wishes to file a second amended complaint that correct the pleading defects identified with respect to his Fourteenth Amendment deliberate indifference claim, he shall do so within thirty (30) days of the date of this order; and it is further ORDER ED that any second amended complaint plaintiff submits shall be a complete pleading, which will supersede the amended complaint, and may not incorporate any portion of the original or amended complaints by reference, in accordance with Local Rule 7.1 (a)(4) of the Local Rules of Practice for this District; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add the City of Kingston as a defendant in this action and amend the caption accordingly; and it is further ORDERED that once the Ci ty of Kingston has filed an answer, plainitff must seek, through discovery, the identity of the Doe defendants; and it is further ORDERED that upon receipt from the plaintiff of the documents required for service of process, the Clerk of the Court sh all issue a summons, together with a copy of plainitff's amended complaint, and forward them to the United States Marshal for service upon the City of Kingston; and it is further ORDERED that, after service of process on defendant City of Kingst on, it shall file a response to the amended complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order to plaintiff along with copies of the unpubished cited in this decision.. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 1/28/2016. (khr) Mailed copy of Memorandun-Decision and Order with copies of unpublished decisions, Form USM-285 on 1/28/2016
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?