Bitetto v. D'Angelo et al
Plaintiff: Marco Bitetto
Defendant: Adam D'Angelo, Charlie Cheever, Marc Bodnick and Quora, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv01499
Filed: December 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Rensselaer
Presiding Judge: Christian F. Hummel
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 8 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report-Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 7 ) shall be Dismissed with prejudice without further Order of this Court, unless with in THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Decision and Order, Plaintiff files a Second Amended Complaint that corrects the pleading defects identified in the Report-Recommendation; and that, should Plaintiff timely file a Second Amended Complaint, it shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Hummel for his review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 6/6/18. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 4 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report and Recommendation in its entirety; Plaintiff's claim for monetary relief pursuant to Title III of the ADA is dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's # 5 Mo tion to Amend his complaint is granted; and Plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint at Docket # 5 is accepted for filing, and the Clerk is directed to separately file and docket that pleading (which is already signed) as the Plaintiff's Ame nded Complaint. This action is returned to Magistrate Hummel for his management of pretrial matters, including his review of the pleading sufficiency of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 1/27/17. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bitetto v. D'Angelo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Bitetto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam D'Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlie Cheever
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marc Bodnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quora, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?