Kent et al v. The New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO et al
| Susan Kent, Carlos Garcia, Maureen Kellman and Ken Johnson |
| The New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, Wayne Spence, Don Morgenstern and Kevin Jones |
| 1:2017cv00268 |
| March 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0401 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
DECISION AND ORDER that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 73 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims pursuant the LMRDA for violation of their right to a fair hearing and for retaliation, as well as their state law claim for b reach of contract based on alleged violations of the PEF Constitution, are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs' state law breach-of-contract claim based on alleged violations of the PEF Code of Ethics is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in state court within the time period governing that claim. Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/31/2020. (sal, )
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that defendants' Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. Nos. 49 - 52 ) is GRANTED in part as stated further herein; and it is further ORDERED, that defendants' Motion for a Protective Order is otherwise DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that (1) within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, defendants will submit to the Court a modified proposed protective order that is reflective of the protections ex plicitly allowed in this Memorandum-Decision & Order, and (2) plaintiffs will have seven (7) days from the date of defendants' submission to file any objections to defendants' modified proposed protective order and/or submit their own propo sed protective order that is in line with the protections explicitly allowed for in this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Thereafter, the Court will consider the proposed protective order(s), adopt a protective order reflective of this Memorandum-Decision & Order, and subsequently lift the discovery stay and set deadlines. Motions terminated: 49 MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/5/2019. (meb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
