AngioDynamics, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| AngioDynamics, Inc. |
| C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00598 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Brenda K. Sannes |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 15 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
458
ORDER: as to evidentiary rulings regarding witnesses Aldrich, Chartrand, Kertesz, and Sands. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/25/2022. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
457
ORDER: as to evidentiary rulings regarding witnesses Burnside. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/23/2022. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
454
ORDER: as to evidentiary rulings regarding witnesses Ingold, Patil, and Kokotis. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/22/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Additional rulings for Witness Ingold) (nmk)
|
|
Filing
443
ORDER: with rulings on objections to deposition designations for witness Greiner. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/21/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Additional rulings for Witness Greiner) (nmk)
|
|
Filing
440
ORDER: with rulings on objections to deposition designations for witness Blaber. The Court notes that its rulings are limited to the deposition designations and do not constitute rulings on the admissibility of related exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/20/2022. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
436
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: regarding evidentiary rulings as to lost sales proffer. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/19/2022. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
432
ORDER: with rulings on objections to deposition designations for witnesses Germano, Powers, and Shepherd. The Court notes that designations should not include attorneys speaking; the Court will not address future objections in that regard. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/16/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Additional rulings for Witness Germano) (nmk)
|
|
Filing
416
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: regarding evidentiary rulings. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/13/2022. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
346
REDACTED MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 345 : It is hereby ORDERED that the parties' motions in limine (Dkt. Nos. 255 , 260 , 262 -68, 270 -74, 277 , 279 , 280 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. It is furth er ORDERED that the motions to seal (Dkt. Nos. 281 , 282 , 305 , 308 , 318 , 324 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. Any renewed motion to seal must be filed within two weeks of the date of this decision. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 7/8/2022. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
202
REDACTED MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 201 : It is hereby ORDERED that AngioDynamics' motion to maintain certain portions of its submission under seal (Dkt. No. 194 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent set forth in this opinio n, and AngioDyna mics is directed to file a copy of its letter brief and exhibits (Dkt. No. 195 ) with revised redactions consistent with this opinion no later than June 25, 2021. It is further ORDERED that Bard's motion to maintain certain por tions of its subm ission under seal (Dkt. No. 197 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Dr. Frankel may not offer a damages analysis at trial based on Indicators 1 through 6 (as defined in this opinion), but may offer a damages analysis based on his alternative calculation for Indicator 7 (as defined in this opinion) that is derived from AngioDynamics' own sales data. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 6/11/2021. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
189
REDACTED MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: RE 188 . It is hereby ORDERED that Bard's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 132 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Bard's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 133 ) is DENIED in its entirety. It is further ORDERED that AngioDynamics' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 134 ) is DENIED in its entirety. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 5/5/2021. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER that the parties' motion to file under seal (Dkt. No. 156 ) and Teleflex's uncontested application to maintain its confidential information under seal (Dkt. No. 155 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice to ren ewal in accordance with this Decision. With respect to the items for which sealing has been denied, the parties may renew their motions to seal no later than March 15, 2021, with supporting affidavits from individuals with personal knowledge setti ng forth the reasons why any proposed redactions meet the sealing standard as articulated in Lugosch. On March 16, 2021, the Clerk of Court shall publicly file those items for which sealing has been denied unless covered by the parties' timely renewed motions to seal. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/1/2021. (rjb, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/6/18. (rjb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
