United States of America ex rel. Anthonitte Carranza v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc., et al.
| 1:2017cv00637 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act - Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting 39 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 41 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 47 Motion to Strike: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees is GRANTED in the amount of& #036;141,537.90, as broken down above; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff is awarded costs of $10,788.78; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion to amend (Dkt. No. 41) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Pla intiff's motion to strike (Dkt. No. 47) is DENIED; and the Court furtherORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 2/10/21. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America ex rel. Anthonitte Carranza v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc., et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
