Meagher v. State University Construction Fund et al
| Terese Meagher |
| State University Construction Fund, Robert Haelen and Joanne Di Stefano |
| 1:2017cv00903 |
| August 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
DECISION AND ORDER that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 59 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's retaliation claims under Title VII and the NYSHRL are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's discrimination claim based on familial status under the NYSHRL is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in state court within the applicable time limits. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/11/2020. (sal)
|
|
Filing
48
DECISION AND ORDER: Defts shall provide additional documents and interrogatory responses as directed by the Court during the 2/14/19 conference; Any of the Pltf's medical records which are provided to defense counsel shall be designated "at ty's eyes only" as stated within. The 24 Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order is amended as follows: The deadline for completion of discovery is extended to 6/3/19. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to 7/31/19. The Mandatory Pretrial Scheduling Order as amended remains in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/21/19. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part # 10 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss such that the following claims are dismissed: (1) Plaintiff's First Claim for hostile work environment discrimination pursuant to Title VII; (2) Pl aintiff's Third Claim for a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983;(3) Plaintiff's Fourth Claim for retaliation pursuant to the 28 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First Amendment;(4 ) Plaintiff's Fifth Claim for a violation of the Substantive Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983; and (5) Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for hostile work environment discrimination pursuant to N.Y. Exec . L. § 296 based on her gender; and the following claims SURVIVE this motion to dismiss: (1) Plaintiff's Second Claim for retaliation pursuant to Title VII; (2) Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for hostile work environment discrimination pursua nt to N.Y. Exec. L. § 296 based on her familial status; and (3) Plaintiff's Seventh Claim for retaliation pursuant to N.Y. Exec. L. § 296. Defendants are directed to file an answer to the Plaintiff's Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Decision & Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(a)(4)(A), and this case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Hummel for the setting of pretrial scheduling deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 6/21/18. (lmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
