Gazzillo et al v. Ply Gem Industries, Inc. et al
| Barbara Morris, James Rensland, Steven Wu and Clement Gazzillo |
| Ply Gem Industries, Inc., Ply Gem Holdings, Inc., Ply Gem Industries, Inc. doing business as Ply Gem and Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. doing business as Ply Gem |
| 1:2017cv01077 |
| September 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Schenectady |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 1/2/2018 at 9:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/26/2017. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (mc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.)(mc) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND: against Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. and Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0206-4145984) filed by Steven Wu, Clement Gazzillo, James Rensland and Barbara Morris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
