Royal v. Shulkin
| Anthony Royal |
| David Shulkin |
| 1:2017cv01251 |
| November 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
DECISION AND ORDER that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 59 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's hostile work environment, discriminatory termination, and retaliation claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 11 ) is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/19/2021. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular and certified mail) (sal )
|
|
Filing
20
DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 14 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's age-discrimination claim under the ADEA (Dkt. No. 11 ) is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/28/18. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
|
|
Filing
8
DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 5 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's claims under the ADEA are dismissed without prejudice, and that within 30 days of the date of this Decision and Order, Plaintiff may submit an Amended Complaint which corrects the pleading deficiencies identified in the Report and Recommendation, and which supercedes and replaces the Complaints filed in these actions in all respects. Plaintiff's Title V II race discrimination claim shall be permitted to proceed, and Plaintiff's disability discrimination claim (which is characterized as having been brought pursuant to Title VII) shall be construed as if brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act , and shall also be permitted to proceed. Service of the complaint and summonses be held in abeyanceuntil plaintiff either submits an amended complaint or after 30 days from the date of this Decision and Order expires. If plaintiff files an amended c omplaint, the Clerk of the Court shall return this case to the Magistrate Judge for review of the sufficiency of the amended complaint and for service. All papers filed in the future should be made in the Lead case 1:17-cv-1251 only. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/8/18. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Royal v. Shulkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Royal | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Shulkin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
