World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. et al v. World Wide Work Tech LLC et al
| World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. and World Wide Technology, Inc. |
| World Wide Work Tech LLC and Najeeb Khan |
| 1:2017cv01350 |
| December 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Lawrence E Kahn |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., World Wide Technology, Inc.. (Schell, Jacquelyn) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT: as to World Wide Work Tech LLC and Najeeb Khan, approving the #9 Request for Entry of Default. (jmb) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Najeeb Khan, World Wide Work Tech LLC by World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., World Wide Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support Of Request To Enter Default)(Schell, Jacquelyn) |
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: On 1/3/2018 Plaintiff filed proof that service of the Summons and Complaint was completed upon Defendants. Dkt. Nos. [6,7]. The time for Defendants to file an answer or otherwise move expired. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a request for a Clerk's Entry of Default against Defendants pursuant to Local Rule 55.2. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 2/8/2018. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/25/2018. (tab)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., World Wide Technology, Inc.. World Wide Work Tech LLC served on 12/19/2017, answer due 1/9/2018. (Schell, Jacquelyn) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., World Wide Technology, Inc.. Najeeb Khan served on 12/19/2017, answer due 1/9/2018. (Schell, Jacquelyn) |
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., World Wide Technology, Inc.. (Schell, Jacquelyn) |
| Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action regarding trademark numbers 2,310,217, 2,354,388, 2,441,740, 4,944,174, and 4,944,175. [Sent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office via regular mail.] (meb) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 3/14/2018 at 09:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 3/7/2018. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (meb) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to World Wide Work Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Najeeb Khan)(meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND: against Najeeb Khan, World Wide Work Tech LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0206-4225779) filed by World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., World Wide Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 WHOIS Print-Out 12-7-17, #3 Worldwidetechnology.online Print-Out 12-7-17, #4 Certificate Of Registration US Reg. No. 2,310,317, #5 Certificate Of Registration US Reg. No. 2,354,388, #6 Certificate Of Registration US Reg. No. 2,441,740, #7 Certificate Of Registration US Reg. No. 4,944,174, #8 Certificate Of Registrtion US Reg. No. 4,944,175, #9 Print-Outs From www.Facebook.com @Worldwidetek)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
