Integra Optics, Inc. v. Nash et al
Plaintiff: Integra Optics, Inc.
Defendant: Alaina M. Nash and Optelian Access Networks Corporation
Case Number: 1:2018cv00345
Filed: March 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Referring Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2018 Filing 3 STATE COURT SUMMONS and COMPLAINT. (dpk)
March 20, 2018 Filing 2 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 4/19/2018 at 10:00 AM in Syracuse before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. All conferences are conducted by telephone. Plaintiff's attorney will initiate the call (unless the Court directs differently) and shall contact Judge Dancks' Chambers at 315-234-8618 (a dedicated line solely for telephone conferences) once all parties are on the line. Counsel may use a teleconferencing service for assistance initiating conference calls to the Court. For cases involving pro se parties, the Court will initiate the call for the Rule 16 Conference. Pro se parties are instructed to provide the Court with a telephone number where they may be reached for a conference call. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 4/12/2018. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (dpk)
March 20, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from NYS Supreme Court - County of Albany, case number 901737-18 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYDC 4327677) filed by Optelian Access Networks Corporation and Alaina M. Nash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint with Exhibits - State Court), #2 Exhibit B (Order to Show Cause - State Court), #3 Exhibit C (Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion - State Court), #4 Exhibit D (Request for Judicial Intervention and Addendum - State Court), #5 Exhibit E (Affirmation of Peter Lauricella - State Court), #6 Exhibit F (Affirmation of J. Pascarell - State Court), #7 Exhibit G (Affidavit of A. Nash - State Court), #8 Exhibit H (Affidavit of B. Hall - State Court), #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Certificate of Service) (dpk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Integra Optics, Inc. v. Nash et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alaina M. Nash
Represented By: Brian J. Gershengorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optelian Access Networks Corporation
Represented By: Brian J. Gershengorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Integra Optics, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher A. Priore
Represented By: Peter A. Lauricella
Represented By: Michel Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?