Bitetto v. Rometty
| Dr. Marco Bitetto |
| Ms. Ginni Rometty |
| 1:2018cv00922 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Rensselaer |
| Christian F Hummel |
| David N Hurd |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SECOND MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (hmr) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ginni Rometty filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to #4 Report and Recommendations by Marco Bitetto. (hmr) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to #4 Report and Recommendations by Marco Bitetto. (hmr) |
Filing 4
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: re #1 Complaint filed by Marco Bitetto: Ordered, that plaintiff's IFP application (Dkt. No #2 ) is Granted; Recommended, that plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. #1 ) be Dismissed without prejudice, providing plaintiff with one opportunity to amend; Recommended, that if the District Judge adopts this Report-Recommendation and Order and permits plaintiff an opportunity to amend, plaintiff be given thirty (30) days from the District Judge's Order to file an amended complaint, and if plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, the case will be dismissed without further order of the Court; and it is Ordered, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Report-Recommendation and Order upon the plaintiff. (Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2018, Case Review Deadline 8/29/2018), Motions terminated: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marco Bitetto.Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 08/08/2018. (Copy of this Report-Recommendation and Order was served via regular mail upon pro se plaintiff, at 4 Fourth Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144 on 8/8/2018.)(hmr)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued and explained to Marco Bitetto at time complaint was filed. [Copy of this notice, pro se packet and copies of all the filed documents were provided to pro se plaintiff at the counter on 8/6/2018.] (hmr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (hmr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ginni Rometty filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bitetto v. Rometty | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dr. Marco Bitetto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ms. Ginni Rometty | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
