Clark v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc.
Brian J. Clark |
Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. |
1:2018cv01298 |
November 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Christian F Hummel |
Frederick J Scullin |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER approving #6 Stipulation filed by Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc., Answer due date updated for Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. answer due 3/7/2019. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 3/22/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.), The Initial Conference is reset for 3/29/2019 @ 9:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/4/2019. (tab) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time of Answer Complaint by Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. submitted to Judge Hummel. (Hartzell, John) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John V. Hartzell on behalf of Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. (Hartzell, John) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Brian J. Clark. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. waiver sent on 11/8/2018, answer due 1/7/2019. (de Oliveira, Carlo Alexandre) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 2/6/2019 at 9:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/30/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (meb) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. (meb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4558464) filed by Brian J. Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Clark v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern New England, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John V. Hartzell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brian J. Clark | |
Represented By: | Carlo Alexandre C. de Oliveira |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.