Maurer v. Sysco Albany, LLC et al
Charles Maurer |
Thomas Teal, Craig Wittenberg and Sysco Albany, LLC |
1:2019cv00821 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Christian F Hummel |
Thomas J McAvoy |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Charles Maurer. All Defendants. (Brock, Timothy) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristi Rich Winters on behalf of Sysco Albany, LLC, Thomas Teal, Craig Wittenberg (Winters, Kristi) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 10/8/2019 at 9:00 AM in Albany before Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 10/1/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (rep) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Sysco Albany, LLC, Thomas Teal, and Craig Wittenberg. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Sysco Albany, LLC, #2 Summons Issued as to Thomas Teal)(rep) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND: Against Sysco Albany, LLC, Thomas Teal, and Craig Wittenberg (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4793967), filed by Charles Maurer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.