Guarneri v. Goodreau et al
| Joseph Paul Guarneri |
| Mark Gaylord, Lora J. Tryon, Julie Sammon, Craig D. Apple, Sr., Michael J. Lyons, Jail Physician Elraleabaury, Melissa Goodreau, Rich Peter, Michael L. Breen and Susan J. Mallery |
| 1:2019cv00921 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to #7 Report and Recommendations by Joseph Paul Guarneri. (hmr) |
Filing 7
ORDER and REPORT-RECOMMENDATION re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joseph Paul Guarneri. RECOMMENDED that pltf's #4 IFP application be DENIED based both because he has failed to properly complete his IFP application as discussed above and because pltf has accumulated three strikes under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and is not entitled to the "imminent danger" exception; RECOMMENDED that if the District Court adopts this Recommendation, the action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, unless within 30 days of the date of the Court's order approving this Recommendation, pltf pays the Court's filing fee of $400; and RECOMENDED that upon pltf's compliance with the District Court's order, the Clerk be directed to return the file to me for review of pltf's complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Objections to R&R due by 9/6/2019 Case Review Deadline 9/10/2019 Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 8/20/2019. (Copy served upon Joseph Paul Guarneri via regular mail on 8/20/2019)(see)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/12/19. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
| Filing 5 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Joseph Paul Guarneri. (nas, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joseph Paul Guarneri. (Attachments: #1 cover letter; envelope) (nas, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. If plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. In the event plaintiff chooses to file an IFP application, it must be accompanied by a signed inmate authorization form in accordance with the Court's Local Rules. Upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 7/30/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail). (sal )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION: For Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Joseph Paul Guarneri. Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (rep) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT: Against Craig D. Apple, Sr, Michael L. Breen, Elraleabaury, Mark Gaylord, Melissa Goodreau, Michael J. Lyons, Susan J. Mallery, Rich Peter, Julie Sammon, and Lora J. Tryon. Filed by Joseph Paul Guarneri, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(rep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
