Centonze v. Munson et al
Dominic Centonze |
Jason Munson and Timothy E. DeForest |
1:2019cv01017 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Mae A D'Agostino |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Timothy E. DeForest, Jason Munson. {copy of summons; pro se manual and Local Rules mailed to plaintiff}(nas, ) |
Filing 2 TEXT ORDER: The clerk is directed to issue summonses as to the defendants in this case and send them to plaintiff for service upon the defendants. Plaintiff is advised that, since plaintiff has paid the filing fee, he is responsible for serving the summons and complaint on each defendant, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Plaintiff is warned that failure to serve the complaint on the defendants may ultimately result in dismissal of his action for failure to prosecute. The court will issue a scheduling order once both defendants respond to the complaint. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 8/20/2019. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail.] (nmk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Timothy E. DeForest, Jason Munson (Filing fee $400 receipt number SYR055645) filed by Dominic Centonze. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 envelope)(nas ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.