Christodoulou v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company
Nickolaos Christodoulou |
Springfield Terminal Railway Company |
1:2019cv01159 |
September 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Brenda K Sannes |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Springfield Terminal Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Pan Am Railways, Inc., Corporate Parent Pan Am Systems, Inc. for Springfield Terminal Railway Company.. (Baynes, Kathleen) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Springfield Terminal Railway Company.(Baynes, Kathleen) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/11/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) Initial Conference set for 12/18/2019 10:30 AM in before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. (mgh) |
CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re #3 G.O. 25 Filing Order. The text of the General Order 25 was modified to reflect the Initial Conference will be held on 12/18/2019 at 10:30 AM and the Civil Case Management Plan and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged on or before 12/11/2019. (mgh) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/18/2019 10:30 AM in Syracuse US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/11/2019. All conferences will be conducted by telephone unless the parties are specifically directed to appear. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed to coordinate the initial conference call. Once all parties are on the conference line, Judge Baxter's chambers can be reached at 315-234-8600. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (mgh) Modified on 9/20/2019 (mgh, ). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Springfield Terminal Railway Company. (mgh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Springfield Terminal Railway Company (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4876225) filed by Nickolaos Christodoulou. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mgh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Christodoulou v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nickolaos Christodoulou | |
Represented By: | Robert T. Naumes, Sr. |
Represented By: | Christopher C. Naumes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Springfield Terminal Railway Company | |
Represented By: | Kathleen McCaffrey Baynes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.