Romero v. Irving Tissue Company Limited et al
Plaintiff: Miguel Romero
Defendant: Distribution Unlimited, Inc. and Irving Tissue Company Limited
Case Number: 1:2019cv01477
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Christian F Hummel
Referring Judge: Frederick J Scullin
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer by Miguel Romero submitted to Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.. (Chinigo, Dario)
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Miguel Romero. Irving Tissue Company Limited served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020. (Chinigo, Dario)
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Miguel Romero. Distribution Unlimited, Inc. served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020. (Chinigo, Dario)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re #2 G.O. 25 Filing Order. When the Rule 16 and civil case management plan deadlines were set in the entry, they were set using year 2019. Clerk corrected the deadlines in the deadlines and in the docket entry to state that the Rule 16 will be held in 2020 (February 25, 2020) and civil case management plan and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/18/2020. (see)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Distribution Unlimited, Inc. and Irving Tissue Company Limited. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Distribution Unlimited, Inc.)(dpk)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 2/25/2020 at 9:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/18/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (dpk) Modified on 12/4/2019 (see, ).
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Distribution Unlimited, Inc., Irving Tissue Company Limited (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4957010) filed by Miguel Romero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (dpk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero v. Irving Tissue Company Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel Romero
Represented By: Dario Anthony Chinigo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Distribution Unlimited, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Irving Tissue Company Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?