United States of America v. Kill et al
United States of America |
XYZ Corporation, John Doe, Bridgette M. Kill and Mary Roe |
1:2019cv01630 |
December 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Christian F Hummel |
Gary L Sharpe |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by United States of America (Malone, Cynthia) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bridgette M. Kill. (jmb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT - ACTION TO FORECLOSE A MORTGAGE: with Exhibits A through E, against Bridgette M. Kill, John Doe, Mary Roe and XYZ Corporation filed by United States of America. Filing Fee Waived. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jmb) |
TEXT NOTICE: Although the plaintiff herein has named John Doe, Mary Roe and XYZ Corporation in the Complaint, the Clerk's Office will not issue summonses for service of process on a "John Doe" defendant at this time. In the event plaintiff wishes to pursue the claims against those defendants, plaintiff shall take reasonable steps to ascertain their identities. When plaintiff determines the identity of the "John Doe" defendants, plaintiff may seek to amend the pleading to add the properly named defendants pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 15 and summons will be issued at that time. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.