Hernandez v. Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC et al
| Sonia Hernandez |
| David M. Kwiat, M.D. and Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC |
| 1:2020cv00042 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Frederick J Scullin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION SELECTING MEDIATOR: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Ira B. Lobel has been selected, contacted and has agreed to serve as Mediator for this action. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that counsel will participate in the mediation session in good faith and confer with the Mediator regarding the scheduling of additional conferences, bearing in mind the deadline for completion of Mediation set forth in the Court's Order Referring the Case to Mediation. Stipulation signed by: Matthew V. Simeone and Brienna L. Christiano. Dated: March 9, 2020(Christiano, Brienna) |
Filing 10
UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Anticipated length of trial: 5 days (Jury Trial). Preferred Trial Location: Albany, NY. Joinder of Parties due by 5/1/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 5/1/2020. Discovery due by 10/9/2020. Motions to be filed by 1/8/2021. Deadline for completion of Mandatory Mediation is 5/29/2020. Status Report due by 6/12/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/10/2020. (tab)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mandatory Mediation. Deadline for Mediator Selection is 3/9/2020. Deadline for completion of Mandatory Mediation is 5/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/10/2020. (tab)
|
| Text Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 2/10/2020. Appearances by Matt Simeone, Esq. for plaintiff; Brianna Christiano, Esq. for Defendants. Pretrial deadlines are established. A Scheduling Order will be issued. (tab) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Answer to Amended Complaint served on Harvey Sanders on 2/7/20, filed by Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC, David M. Kwiat, M.D.. (Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint /Amended Complaint by Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC, David M. Kwiat, M.D..(Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC, David M. Kwiat, M.D.. (Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 5 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 2/10/2020 at 10:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/3/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (hmr) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC, David M. Kwiat, M.D. (hmr) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED STATE COURT AMENDED COMPLAINT relating to #1 Notice of Removal. (hmr) |
| Filing 2 STATE COURT SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT relating to #1 Notice of Removal. (hmr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Supreme Court, case number 2018-491 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4996760) filed by Kwiat Eye and Laser Surgery, PLLC, David M. Kwiat, M.D.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Amended Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
