Pellegrino v. First Unum Life Insurance Company
Andrew Pellegrino |
First Unum Life Insurance Company |
1:2020cv00484 |
April 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
David N Hurd |
Daniel J Stewart |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Based upon the Stipulation filed on June 1, 2020, Dkt. No. #6 , the deadline in which Defendant is to file a response to the Complaint in this matter is extended to August 5, 2020. In light of this extension, the Rule 16 Initial Conference scheduled for July 28, 2020 before the undersigned and the deadline for the parties to file a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and exchange Mandatory Disclosures are ADJOURNED without date and will be rescheduled upon the filing of Defendant's Answer. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 6/3/2020. (mab) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION re Extension of Time to August 5, 2020 to Respond to Complaint by First Unum Life Insurance Company submitted to Judge Hon. Daniel J. Stewart. (Bennici, Gregory) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory James Bennici on behalf of First Unum Life Insurance Company (Bennici, Gregory) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance AND Waiver of Service of Summons by Patrick W. Begos on behalf of First Unum Life Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service)(Begos, Patrick) Modified on 5/6/2020 (see, ). |
***Answer due date updated for First Unum Life Insurance Company answer due 7/6/2020. (see) |
CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re #4 Notice of Appearance. Added to docket text that a Waiver of Service of Summons is attached. (see) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial In Person Rule 16 Conference set for 7/28/2020 at 9:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 7/21/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (kmp) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to First Unum Life Insurance Company. (kmp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Unum Life Insurance Company (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-5103170) filed by Andrew Pellegrino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pellegrino v. First Unum Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew Pellegrino | |
Represented By: | Madison Tate Donaldson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: First Unum Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Gregory James Bennici |
Represented By: | Patrick W. Begos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.