In re: Christine Marie Reeves
Defendant: Unnamed Defendants
In Re: Christine Marie Reeves
Case Number: 1:2020cv00523
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brenda K Sannes
Referring Judge: Daniel J Stewart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's emergency motion (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case; if Plaintiff desires to pursue this action, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order, she must: (1) so notify the Court; and (2) file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions. Upon Plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. The Clerk is directed to serve this Order, and a copy of an in forma pauperis application, in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 6/5/2020. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular and certified mail)(rjb, )
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to seal (Dkt. No. #2 ) is DENIED; that Plaintiff (1) serve a copy of her submissions on the parties she intends to name as defendant(s) in this matter, (2) file a certificate of service with the Court by May 26, 2020, (3) file a complaint by May 26, 2020 specifically identifying the individual(s) she intends to name as defendant(s) in this matter, and (4) file a letter addressing the above-referenced abstention issue. If Plaintiff is unable to demonstrate that abstention is unwarranted, her request for emergency relief will be denied, and this this case will be closed. As Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee in this action and her In Forma Pauperis Application (IFP Application) (Dkt. No. #3 ) is incomplete, Plaintiff must pay the filing fee or file a completed IFP Application by May 26, 2020; if Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee or file a completed IFP application by May 26, 2020, this action will be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to serve this Order, and a copy of an IFP Application, in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 5/11/2020. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular and certified mail)(rjb, )
May 8, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christine Marie Reeves.(dpk)
May 8, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Seal Case filed by Christine Marie Reeves. (dpk)
May 8, 2020 Filing 1 EMERGENCY MOTION for Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus by Christine Marie Reeves. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter to the Clerk)(dpk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Christine Marie Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Christine Marie Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unnamed Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?