The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc.
The Phoenix Insurance Company |
Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. |
1:2020cv00823 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Christian F Hummel |
Frederick J Scullin |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION for Protective Order /Proposed Protective Order Stipulated by Parties filed by Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc.. Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (Freedenberg, John) |
![]() |
![]() |
Text Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 8/21/2020 by telephone. Appearances by Melissa Sullivan, Esq. for Plaintiff Phoenix Insurance Co. Murray Brower, Esq. for Plaintiff Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. and from 20-CV-826 related case; John P. Freedenberg, Esq. for Defendant Crane Merchandising System. Pretrial deadlines are established in both 20-CV-823 and 20-CV-826. Scheduling Orders will be issued. Mandatory Mediation is set. (tab) |
Filing 6 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Proposed) by Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc.. (Freedenberg, John) |
Filing 5 COURT NOTICE of dial-in instructions for Chambers Teleconference: This case is scheduled for it's Initial Conference on 8/21/2020 @ 9:00 AM. This Court conference will be conducted telephonically and the parties are directed to dial in at 1-888-684-8852, enter Access code 9772719#, and use Security code 1234# to join the call. (tab) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc..(Freedenberg, John) |
***Answer due date updated for Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. answer due 7/29/2020. (khr) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 8/21/2020 09:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 8/14/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (khr) |
Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT filed by Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. (khr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from NYS Supreme Court - County of Albany, case number 904318-20 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-5181123) filed by Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John P. Freedenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Melissa Sullivan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.