DiMartile et al v. Cuomo et al
Case Number: 1:2020cv00859
Filed: August 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 DECISION AND ORDER that the State Defendants' motion for a stay of the preliminary injunction order pending appeal (Dkt. No. 27 ) is DENIED. Plaintiffs' cross-motion for sanctions (Dkt. No. 31 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/19/2020. (sal )
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DECISION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 4 ) is GRANTED. Defendants are PRELIMINARILY ENJOINED from enforcing the above-referenced 50-person limit (under Executive Order 202.45 and attendant regulati ons, guidance, and directives) against Plaintiffs in the operation of their weddings at the above-referenced venues. In holding their weddings, Plaintiffs are required to comply at all times with the relevant health and safety precautions that hav e been outlined by the State related to the operations of restaurants, including (but not limited to) not having a gathering of individuals that is more than 50-percent of the relevant venue's capacity. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/7/2020. (sal )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DiMartile et al v. Cuomo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?