Ingraham et al v. Palantine Motel
Plaintiff: Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham
Defendant: Palantine Motel
Case Number: 1:2020cv01187
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Miroslav Lovric
Referring Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 Filing 10 PRO SE NOTICE returned executed as to Bruce Ingraham. (jel, )
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 PRO SE NOTICE returned executed as to Holly Ingraham. (jel, )
October 8, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham. Effective Date 10/8/2020. Old Address: 6102 State Highway 5, Apt. 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 12010. New Address: 2455 Rt. 8, Apt. 2, Lake Pleasant, NY 12108. (dpk)
October 8, 2020 Mailed copies of the #1 Complaint, #6 Pro Se Handbook and Notice Issued and pro se packet, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Pro Se Handbook and Notice Issued to pltf at P.O. Box 861, Lake Pleasant, NY 12108 on 10/8/2020 by regular mail. (see)
October 8, 2020 Mailed copies of the complaint, both IFP applications, and pro se packets with notices on 10/8/2020 by regular mail. (see)
October 6, 2020 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #1 Complaint, #6 Pro Se Handbook and Notice Issued and #5 Pro Se Handbook and Notice Issued sent to Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham. Address sent to 6102 State Highway 5, Apt. 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428. (dpk)
September 29, 2020 Filing 6 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued and explained to Bruce Ingraham at time complaint was filed. (dpk)
September 29, 2020 Filing 5 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE mailed to Holly Ingraham at time complaint was filed (dpk)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS by Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (dpk)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Holly Ingraham. Motions referred to Miroslav Lovric. (dpk)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Bruce Ingraham. Motions referred to Miroslav Lovric. (dpk)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Palantine Motel filed by Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham.(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dpk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2020: #2 Mailing Envelope) (dpk, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingraham et al v. Palantine Motel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holly Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palantine Motel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?