Ingraham, et al v. Saint Mary Hospital et al.
Plaintiff: Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham
Defendant: Saint Mary Hospital and Dr. Christopher Mierek
Case Number: 1:2020cv01189
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Mae A D'Agostino
Referring Judge: Christian F Hummel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Bruce Ingraham. Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (mgh)
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff Holly Ingraham has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 10/23/2020. {A copy of this Text Order was served upon both pro se plaintiffs by regular mail, another blank IFP application was sent to Bruce Ingraham}(pjh, )
October 23, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Holly Ingraham, Pro Se. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. {Clerk notes that this motion contains the case number 1:20-cv-1189, however the caption relates to 1:20-cv-01188 which has already has a pending IFP motion}(pjh, )
October 8, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Bruce Ingraham, Holly Ingraham Effective Date 10/7/2020 Old Address: 6102 St. Highway 5, Apt. 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428 New Address: 2455 Rt. 8, Apt. 2, PO Box 861, Lake Pleasant, NY 12108 (jel, )
October 8, 2020 Mailed copies of the complaint and Order Directing Administrative Closure to pltfs at their new address on 10/8/2020 by regular mail. (see)
October 6, 2020 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. re: #1 Copy of Complaint sent to Bruce and Holly Ingraham 6102 State Hwy 5 Apt 5 Palantine Address sent to State Hwy 5 Apt 5 Palantine Bridge, NY 13428 (mgh)
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. re: 3 Text-Only Notice Regarding Judge D'Agostino Case Disposition Pilot, #2 Order Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement, sent to Holly Ingraham Address sent to 6102 State Hwy 5, Apartment 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428 (mgh)
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. re: 3 Text-Only Notice Regarding Judge D'Agostino Case Disposition Pilot, #2 Order Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement, sent to Bruce Ingraham Address sent to 6107 State Hwy 5 Apartment 5 Palantine Bridge, NY 13428. (mgh)
September 29, 2020 Filing 3 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. https://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/MAD_Rules_of_Practice_04_14_2020.pdf. (mgh)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; ORDERED that if plaintiffs desires to pursue this action, they must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application; and it is further; ORDERED that upon plaintiffs compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/28/2020. (Copy of Order and (2) Blank IFP Applications served via regular mail)(mgh)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher Mierek, Saint Mary Hospital filed by Bruce Ingraham, Holly Ingraham. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(mgh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingraham, et al v. Saint Mary Hospital et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holly Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saint Mary Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Christopher Mierek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?