Ingraham et al v. Hartford Conniceut Insurance
| Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham |
| Hartford Conniceut Insurance |
| 1:2020cv01190 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Gary L Sharpe |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - That the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 10) is ADOPTED in its entirety. That plaintiffs' complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to replead in full compliance with the Report-Recommendation and Order. That plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. That, if plaintiffs file an amended complaint in the time frame permitted, the amended complaint will be referred to Magistrate Judge Stewart for further review. That, if plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint in the time permitted, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment without further order of the court. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/23/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(jel, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Granting the #11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Bruce Ingraham. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 11/2/2020. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiffs via regular mail) (jmb)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Bruce Ingraham, Pro Se. Motion referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (jmb) |
|
Filing 10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION & ORDER: It is Recommended that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint filed by Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham be DISMISSED, but that Plaintiffs be granted leave to replead; and it is ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Report-Recommendation and Order upon the parties to this action. Objections to R&R due by 11/12/2020. Case Review Deadline 11/16/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 10/29/2020. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiffs' via regular mail) (jmb)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Granting the #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Holly Ingraham. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 10/29/2020. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiffs via regular mail)(jmb)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff Holly Ingraham has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/23/2020. {A copy of this Text Order was served upon both pro se plaintiffs by regular mail, another blank IFP application was sent to Bruce Ingraham} (jmb)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Holly Ingraham, Pro Se. Motion referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (jmb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS with STATUS REPORT and LETTERS: requesting that the Hartford Insurance Company no correspond with them, filed by Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham. Effective Date 10/8/2020. Old Address: 6102 State Highway 5, Apartment 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428. New Address: 2455 Route 8, Apartment 2, Lake Pleasant, NY 12108. [Utica Clerk re-served the previously returned documents at the new address by regular mail} (jmb) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: regarding service of the #2 Order Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement, sent to Holly Ingraham at 6102 State Highway 5 Apartment 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428 (This is the last known address that was confirmed by plaintiffs' at the public counter in Utica, NY when the complaint was filed.) Envelope marked "Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward" (jmb) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: regarding service of the #2 Order Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement, sent to Bruce Ingraham at 6102 State Highway 5 Apartment 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428 (This is the last known address that was confirmed by plaintiffs' at the public counter in Utica, NY when the complaint was filed.) Envelope marked "Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward" (jmb) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable as to Bruce and Holly Ingraham regarding service of the #1 Complaint, sent by the Utica Clerk's Office to the last known address information of 6102 State Highway 5, Apartment 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428. Envelope marked "Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward" (jmb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE: with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/28/2020. (Copy served upon pro se plaintiffs' via regular mail at 6102 State Highway 5, Apartment 5, Palantine Bridge, NY 13428) (jmb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT: against Hartford Conniceut Insurance filed by Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) {Clerk notes: no filing fee or IFP application was submitted, and further no proposed summons or civil cover sheet were provided either}. Clerk mailed a courtesy copy of the complaint to the pro se plaintiffs on 9/29/2020 via regular mail. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
