Brown v. Rush Street Gaming, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Kendra Brown
Defendant: Rush Street Gaming, LLC and Capital Region Gaming, LLC doing business as Rivers Casino & Resort Schenectady
Case Number: 1:2022cv00392
Filed: April 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: David N Hurd
Referring Judge: Daniel J Stewart
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David N. Hurd in Utica, NY. In Person Class Settlement Fairness Hearing held on 1/19/2023. Judge Hurd has case called, with no persons appearing in open Court to object to the fairness of the proposed Class action settlement, the Court Grants the filing of the Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Order and Judgment. Appearances: Alexander T. Ricke, Esq. Matthew T. Dunn, Esq. and Ryan L.McClelland, Esq for Plaintiff Class, Alexander Scott Dahle, Esq. for Defendants Rush Street Gaming, LLC, Capital RegionGaming, LLC. (Court Reporter Lisa Mazzei) (ptm)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 39 JUDGMENT: It is Ordered and Adjudged: that Brown's motion for final approval of the class action settlement (Dkt. No. #36 ) is Granted; that Brown's motion for attorney's fees and expenses and a service award (Dkt. No. #35 ) is Granted; that the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332, and 1367, including jurisdiction over all members of the Settlement Class certified on September 22, 2022; that the Settlement Class satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and is maintainable under Rule 23(b)(3) for purposes of settlement of this litigation only; that the Court confirms the appointments of: (a) Named Plaintiff Kendra Brown as Class Representative of the Settlement Class, and (b) the law firms of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, McClelland Law Firm P. C., and Getman, Sweeney & Dunn PLLC, as Class Counsel; that the Notice of Settlement sent to the Class Members via First Class Mail adequately informed the Class Members of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, their estimated recovery if the Settlement was approved, the process available to obtain monetary relief, their right to request exclusion from the Class and pursue their own remedies, and their opportunity to file written objections and appear and be heard at the Final Approval Hearing; that the Notice of Settlement adequately informed the Class Members of the contact information for the Settlement Administrator and Class Counsel; that the Notice of Settlement provided to the Class Members satisfied the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 23(e)(1)(B); that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2), the settlement memorialized in the Settlement Agreement, and filed with the Court, is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class Members; that the Court finds that: (a)the strength of the Class Representative's and Class Members' claims weighed against the defenses of Defendants and the complexity, length, and expense of further litigation, support approval of the Settlement; (b) the Maximum Settlement Amount of $5,500,000 as set forth in the Settlement Agreement is a fair, reasonable, and adequate settlement of the Named Plaintiff's individual claims and the claims of the Settlement Class; (c) the Settlement was reached pursuant to arm's-length negotiations between the parties overseen by a mediator; (d) the support for the Settlement expressed by Class Counsel and counsel for Settling Entities, who have significant experience representing parties in complex class actions, including those involving wage and hour claims, weighs in favor of approval of the Settlement; (e) the absence of any objections to the Settlement by Class Members supports approval of the Settlement; and (f) the parties had sufficient information such that the Court and the parties could evaluate the merits of the case, potential damages, and the probable course of future litigation; that the Court finds the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2); that the Court finds that the resolution of the Fair Labor Standards Act claims represents a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute; that the Settlement Administration Costs of $20,622 are approved and shall be paid to the Settlement Administrator from the Qualified Settlement Fund according to the procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that the Service Payment, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, is approved and shall be awarded and paid to Named Plaintiff from the Qualified Settlement Fund according to the procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that Class Counsel is awarded one-third of the settlement fund ($1,833,150) for attorneys' fees and $33,542.59 for costs and expenses and will receive such payment from the Qualified Settlement Fund according to the procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that Class Members shall receive their settlement shares according to the allocation formula and procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that any Class Member who did not timely request exclusion from the Settlement Agreement is bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and fully releases and discharges the Released State Claims; that any Class Member who negotiates his or her Settlement Check is bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and fully releases and discharges the Released Federal Claims upon such negotiation of his or her Settlement Check; that as identified by the Settlement Administrator in Exhibit B to the Declaration of Richard W. Simmons filed in support of Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement (Dkt. No. 36-4), the Court finds that one individual, Tammy L. McKinney, has timely requested exclusion from the Settlement Class. As a result, Tammy L. McKinney is: (a) excluded from the Settlement Class previously certified; (b) is not bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) does not release or discharge the Released Class Claims; and (d) is not entitled to participate in the Settlement; that the notices to government officials of this settlement have been transmitted as required under the Class Action Fairness Act; that Final approval of the Settlement is Granted; and that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without costs to any of the parties except as provided in the Settlement Agreement; and that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate the pending motions, and close the file. All pursuant to the Dkt. No. #38 Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement of the Honorable U.S. District Court Judge David N. Hurd on 01/19/2023. (hmr)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement: that Brown's motion for final approval of the class action settlement (Dkt. No. #36 ) is Granted; that Brown's motion for attorney's fees and expenses and a service award (Dkt. No. #35 ) is Granted; that the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332, and 1367, including jurisdiction over all members of the Settlement Class certified on September 22, 2022; that the Settlement Class satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and is maintainable under Rule 23(b)(3) for purposes of settlement of this litigation only; that the Court confirms the appointments of: (a) Named Plaintiff Kendra Brown as Class Representative of the Settlement Class, and (b) the law firms of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, McClelland Law Firm P. C., and Getman, Sweeney & Dunn PLLC, as Class Counsel; that the Notice of Settlement sent to the Class Members via First Class Mail adequately informed the Class Members of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, their estimated recovery if the Settlement was approved, the process available to obtain monetary relief, their right to request exclusion from the Class and pursue their own remedies, and their opportunity to file written objections and appear and be heard at the Final Approval Hearing; that the Notice of Settlement adequately informed the Class Members of the contact information for the Settlement Administrator and Class Counsel; that the Notice of Settlement provided to the Class Members satisfied the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 23(e)(1)(B); that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2), the settlement memorialized in the Settlement Agreement, and filed with the Court, is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class Members; that the Court finds that: (a)the strength of the Class Representative's and Class Members' claims weighed against the defenses of Defendants and the complexity, length, and expense of further litigation, support approval of the Settlement; (b) the Maximum Settlement Amount of $5,500,000 as set forth in the Settlement Agreement is a fair, reasonable, and adequate settlement of the Named Plaintiff's individual claims and the claims of the Settlement Class; (c) the Settlement was reached pursuant to arm's-length negotiations between the parties overseen by a mediator; (d) the support for the Settlement expressed by Class Counsel and counsel for Settling Entities, who have significant experience representing parties in complex class actions, including those involving wage and hour claims, weighs in favor of approval of the Settlement; (e) the absence of any objections to the Settlement by Class Members supports approval of the Settlement; and (f) the parties had sufficient information such that the Court and the parties could evaluate the merits of the case, potential damages, and the probable course of future litigation; that the Court finds the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2); that the Court finds that the resolution of the Fair Labor Standards Act claims represents a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute; that the Settlement Administration Costs of $20,622 are approved and shall be paid to the Settlement Administrator from the Qualified Settlement Fund according to the procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that the Service Payment, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, is approved and shall be awarded and paid to Named Plaintiff from the Qualified Settlement Fund according to the procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that Class Counsel is awarded one-third of the settlement fund ($1,833,150) for attorneys' fees and $33,542.59 for costs and expenses and will receive such payment from the Qualified Settlement Fund according to the procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that Class Members shall receive their settlement shares according to the allocation formula and procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement; that any Class Member who did not timely request exclusion from the Settlement Agreement is bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and fully releases and discharges the Released State Claims; that any Class Member who negotiates his or her Settlement Check is bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and fully releases and discharges the Released Federal Claims upon such negotiation of his or her Settlement Check; that as identified by the Settlement Administrator in Exhibit B to the Declaration of Richard W. Simmons filed in support of Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement (Dkt. No. 36-4), the Court finds that one individual, Tammy L. McKinney, has timely requested exclusion from the Settlement Class. As a result, Tammy L. McKinney is: (a) excluded from the Settlement Class previously certified; (b) is not bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) does not release or discharge the Released Class Claims; and (d) is not entitled to participate in the Settlement; that the notices to government officials of this settlement have been transmitted as required under the Class Action Fairness Act; that Final approval of the Settlement is Granted; and that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without costs to any of the parties except as provided in the Settlement Agreement; and that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate the pending motions, and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 01/19/2023. (hmr)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 37 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Scott Dahle on behalf of Capital Region Gaming, LLC, Rush Street Gaming, LLC (Dahle, Alexander)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT NOTICE OF IN COURT CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING. Pursuant to the September 22, 2022 Order of the Hon. David N. Hurd, USDJ, an In Person In Court Final Approval Hearing is set on January 19, 2023 at 1:00pm in the USDC / Utica, New York to determine the overall fairness of the settlement and to approve the amount of attorneys fees and costs to Class Counsel and the Service Payment to the named plaintiff. Appearances by counsel in court in Utica are required. (Class Action Settlement Hearing set for 1/19/2023 01:00 PM in Utica before Judge David N. Hurd.) (ptm)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MOTION for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement (Unopposed) filed by Kendra Brown. Response to Motion due by 1/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration Alexander T. Ricke, #3 Exhibit(s) 1 (Proposed Order), #4 Declaration Richard W. Simmons) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (Ricke, Alexander)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Kendra Brown. Response to Motion due by 1/4/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration Alexander T. Ricke, #3 Exhibit 1) (Ricke, Alexander)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Directing Class Notice: that Brown's #33 unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement is GRANTED; that the Court FINDS, on a preliminary basis, that the settlement memorialized in the parties Settlement Agreement and filed with the Court (Dkt. No. 33) falls within the range of reasonableness and, therefore, meets the requirements for preliminary approval as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e); that the Preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement is GRANTED; For settlement purposes only, the following Settlement Class is CERTIFIED pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and FED. R. CIV. P. 23: all non-exempt, hourly, tipped employees at Rivers Casino earning a direct cash wage of less than the applicable New York state minimum wage between February 8, 2017 and April 12, 2022. For settlement purposes only, named plaintiff Kendra Brown is APPOINTED as the Class Representative of the Settlement Class; that for settlement purposes only, the law firms of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, McClelland Law Firm, P.C., and Getman, Sweeney & Dunn PLLC are APPOINTED as Class Counsel for the purposes of Settlement; that the parties are AUTHORIZED to select a qualified third-party settlement administrator to perform the duties of the Settlement Administrator in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement; that the proposed Notice of Settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement is hereby FOUND and DETERMINED to be the best practicable means of providing notice under the circumstances and, when completed, shall constitute due and sufficient notice of the proposed class settlement and the Final Approval Hearing to all persons and entities affected by and/or entitled to participate in the settlement, in full compliance with the notice requirements of FED. R. CIV. P. 23, due process, the Constitution of the United States, the laws of the State of New York, and all other applicable laws; It is further FOUND and DETERMINED that the Notice of Settlement is accurate, objective, and informative, and provides members of the Settlement Class with all of the information necessary to make an informed decision regarding their participation in the settlement and its fairness; that the Settlement Administrator is AUTHORIZED to mail the Notice of Settlement to the Class Employees as provided in the Settlement Agreement; Class Employees who wish to opt out of the Settlement must SUBMIT their written request to opt out NO LATER THAN: (a) forty-five (45) days from the date the Settlement Administrator first mails the Notice of Settlement to Class Employees, or (b) thirty (30) days from the date the Settlement Administrator mails the Notice of Settlement to a Class Employees additional address, whichever date is later, provided that under no circumstances will any Class Employee be permitted to opt out more than seventy-five (75) days from date the Settlement Administrator first mails the Notice of Settlement to Class Employees; that any written objection to the Settlement must be SUBMITTED to the Settlement Administrator no later than forty-five (45) days after the Notices of Settlement are mailed to the Class Employees; Pending a decision on final approval of the settlement, this matter is STAYED other than as set out in this Order; that the named plaintiff and defendants are ORDERED to carry out and effect the settlement according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; that the Court will conduct a Final Approval Hearing on January 19, 2023 at 1 p.m. in Utica, New York to determine the overall fairness of the settlement and to approve the amount of attorneys fees and costs to Class Counsel and the Service Payment to the named plaintiff; that the Final Approval Hearing may be continued without further notice to Class Members; and that the named plaintiff shall file her motion for approval of the settlement, and Class Counsel shall file their unopposed motion for attorneys fees, costs and expenses, and the named plaintiffs Service Payment on or before February 16, 2023. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 09/22/2022. (hmr)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 NOTICE by Kendra Brown re #32 MOTION To Direct Class Notice and Grant Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Kendra Brown. Plaintiff's Notice of Filing Fully Executed Settlement Agreement (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Settlement Agreement)(Ricke, Alexander)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re #32 Motion, Clerk modified the docket text to reflect the correct judge the Motion is before. The Motion is now before Judge David N. Hurd. (ztc, )
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MOTION To Direct Class Notice and Grant Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Kendra Brown. Response to Motion due by 9/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration of Alexander T. Ricke, #3 Ex. 1) Motions referred to Judge David N. Hurd. (Ricke, Alexander) Modified on 8/25/2022 to reflect the correct judge the Motion is before (ztc, ).
August 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting #30 Joint Request to extend time. Plaintiff shall file her motion for preliminary approval on or before Wednesday, August 24, 2022. Pursuant to the verbal order of USDJ David N. Hurd. (rjm)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Letter Motion from Alexander Ricke for Kendra Brown requesting Extension of Time submitted to Judge David N. Hurd . (Ricke, Alexander)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting #28 Letter Request/Letter Motion from Noel P. Tripp for Capital Region Gaming, LLC, Rush Street Gaming, LLC requesting extension of time for Plaintiff to file motion for preliminary approval of settlement. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of the parties' class-wide settlement is now due by 8/19/2022. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 08/11/2022. (hmr)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Joint Letter Motion from Noel P. Tripp for Capital Region Gaming, LLC, Rush Street Gaming, LLC requesting extension of time for Plaintiff to file motion for preliminary approval of settlement submitted to Judge David N. Hurd . (Tripp, Noel)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 NOTICE of Appearance by Noel P. Tripp on behalf of All Defendants (Tripp, Noel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 TEXT ORDER CANCELLING PENDING LITIGATION DEADLINES: Pursuant to the the verbal Order of the Hon. David N. Hurd, USDJ, and upon the filing of Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement of this class action at Dkt. No. #25 , all pending litigation deadlines are hereby terminated, without prejudice to renew, and held in abeyance pending the submission of settlement approval papers. So Ordered by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/12/2022. (ptm)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 NOTICE of Settlement by Kendra Brown (Dunn, Matthew)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Rahmberg on behalf of Kendra Brown (Rahmberg, Michael)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan L. McClelland on behalf of Kendra Brown (McClelland, Ryan)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb Wagner on behalf of Kendra Brown (Wagner, Caleb)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by George A. Hanson on behalf of Kendra Brown (Hanson, George)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander T. Ricke on behalf of Kendra Brown (Ricke, Alexander)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Answer due date updated for Capital Region Gaming, LLC answer due 5/20/2022; Rush Street Gaming, LLC answer due 5/20/2022. (hmr)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summon served on Rush Street Gaming, LLC, c/o CT Corporation System through Vincenza Cipriano, Intake Specialist on 04/29/2022, filed by Kendra Brown. (Dunn, Matthew)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Capital Region Gaming, LLC, d/b/a Rivers Casino & Resort Schenectaday through Vincenza Cipriano, Intake Specialist on 04/29/2022, filed by Kendra Brown. (Dunn, Matthew)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Michael J. Rahmberg is hereby admitted to practice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 5/6/2022. (mab)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Caleb Wagner is hereby admitted to practice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 5/6/2022. (mab)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Alexander Ricke is hereby admitted to practice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 5/6/2022. (mab)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Ryan L. McClelland is hereby admitted to practice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 5/6/2022. (mab)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice. Attorney George Hanson is hereby admitted to practice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 5/6/2022. (mab)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of MICHAEL J. RAHMBERG Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-5894183. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matt Dunn, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 E-File Registration, #4 Petition for Admission PHV) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (Dunn, Matthew)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of CALEB WAGNER Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-5894171. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matt Dunn, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 E-File Registration, #4 Petition for Admission PHV) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (Dunn, Matthew)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of ALEXANDER RICKE Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-5894161. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matt Dunn, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 E-File Registration Form, #4 Petition for Admission PHV) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (Dunn, Matthew)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of RYAN L. MCCLELLAND Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-5894142. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matt Dunn, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 E-File Registration, #4 Petition for Admission PHV) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (Dunn, Matthew)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of GEORGE HANSON Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-5894129. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Petition for Admission PHV, #4 E-File Registration Form) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (Dunn, Matthew)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summonses Issued as to Capital Region Gaming, LLC, Rush Street Gaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for Capital Region Gaming, LLC)(hmr)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES): Kendra Brown is requesting summons(es) be issued as to Rush Street Gaming, LLC re: #1 Complaint. (Dunn, Matthew)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES): Kendra Brown is requesting summons(es) be issued as to Capital Region Gaming, LLC re: #1 Complaint. (Dunn, Matthew)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMISSION REQUIREMENT as to Party Plaintiff; Attorney Ryan L. McClelland; Michael J. Rahmberg, Email address is ryan@mcclellandlawfim.com; mrahmberg@mcclellandlaw.firm.com. Phone number is 816-781-0002. Admissions due by 5/11/2022. [Copy emailed to Attorney McClelland and Attorney Rahmberg on 4/27/2022.](hmr)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMISSION REQUIREMENT as to Party Plainitff; Attorney George A. Hanson, Alexander T. Ricke and Caleb J. Wagner, Email addresses are hanson@stuevesiegel.com; ricke@stuevesiegel.com; wagner@stuevesiegel.com. Phone number is 816-714-7100. Admissions due by 5/11/2022. [Copy emailed to Attorney Hanson, Attorney Ricke and Attorney Wagner on 4/27/2022.](hmr)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 7/28/2022 at 09:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 7/21/2022. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) [A courtesy copy was provided to Attorney Hanson, Attorney Ricke, Attorney Wagner, Attorney McClelland and Attorney Rahmberg via email on 4/27/2022.] (hmr)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the following Filing Deficiency: Proposed Summons(es) were not included with the Complaint. Counsel is directed to file proposed summons(es) on the docket using the REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES) event within 3 days of this notice. Notice of Filing Deficiency Deadline 5/2/2022 (hmr)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Capital Region Gaming, LLC, Rush Street Gaming, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5883454) filed by Kendra Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Rush Street Gaming, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendra Brown
Represented By: Matthew T. Dunn
Represented By: Alexander T. Ricke
Represented By: Caleb Wagner
Represented By: George A. Hanson
Represented By: Michael J. Rahmberg
Represented By: Ryan L. McClelland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rush Street Gaming, LLC
Represented By: Noel P. Tripp
Represented By: Alexander Scott Dahle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital Region Gaming, LLC doing business as Rivers Casino & Resort Schenectady
Represented By: Noel P. Tripp
Represented By: Alexander Scott Dahle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?