Khan v. Escrogima et al
| Samia Khalid Khan |
| Ana Escrogima, Katherine Brucker and Antony Blinken |
| 1:2022cv00593 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samia Khalid Khan. Antony Blinken served on 6/13/2022, answer due 8/12/2022; Katherine Brucker served on 6/13/2022, answer due 8/12/2022; Ana Escrogima served on 6/13/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Katherine Brucker, Ana Escrogima, Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, Attorney General of the United States, United States Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued: Katherine Brucker, #2 Summons Issued: Antony Blinken, Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, #3 Summons Issued: Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, #4 Summons Issued: Carla Freedman, United States Attorney)(map) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Antony Blinken, Katherine Brucker, Ana Escrogima (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5927157) filed by Samia Khalid Khan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(map) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
